Pteridium aquilinum otherwise known as Bracken, is a common fern in many woodlands.  It is a vigorous and resilient species found throughout the UK.  When trees are felled or spaces appear in woodlands, bracken is quick to colonise taking advantage of the increased light. It grows quickly and its fronds can limit the growth of young trees through its dense shading. Similarly at the end of a growing season, the dying fronds can literally smother germinating seedlings and young saplings. Before dying down, bracken can store many materials in its extensive underground rhizome system.  It can tolerate adverse weather and difficult soil conditions  but generally prefers not to be in waterlogged  soils. It is not subject to significant grazing pressure or attack by insect pests or pathogens.  Consequently, it is a highly competitive species, reducing biodiversity.  Some woodland plants can survive in its presence, if they grow in early spring before the emergence of the fronds. [caption id="attachment_5892" align="alignleft" width="240"] A TICK[/caption] Bracken contains metabolites, which when ingested by animals, like cattle, have been linked to cancer of the bladder. It contains a toxin Ptaquiloside and the young leaves when crushed or eaten release hydrogen cyanide. Bracken is also known to harbour ticks, which can spread Lyme Disease. So, it not surprising that bracken is regarded as a weed by managers of woodland, field and pasture; it needs to be controlled, preferably eliminated.  But how to do this is problematic.  A number of strategies have been employed with varying degrees of success.  In woodland, the main objective is to suppress its vigour so that saplings can fully establish themselves . In the past, bracken had a number of uses – for example, as animal bedding which was later composted to give a nutrient-rich mulch.  Also, used for thatching, as a source of potash (pot ash = plant ashes soaked in water in a pot giving a soluble form of potassium K+).  This harvesting of bracken in historical times probably helped limit its spread. However, it is now spreading and its dominance in some areas / habitats is a concern. Bracken can be weakened by the cutting or crushing of the fronds, particularly if this is repeated on a regular basis.  This is both time consuming and expensive. Ploughing the soil, this cuts the underground rhizomes, exposing them on the  surface where they might dry out or freeze.  Ploughing has to be done carefully, as can significantly disturb the soil which can lead to erosion. Pigs can have the same effect as ploughing if the soil is shallow.  Generally these methods are now used. Other techniques included the burning of leaf litter and woody material but this has little effect on reducing the vitality of the bracken, in fact, the release of nutrients from the resulting ash may encourage the growth of the bracken.  Wood chip mulches are similarly ineffective, as are artificial mulches / membranes (difficult to secure them). Herbicides, such as asulam and glyphosate are effective in reducing fronds emerging after its application.  Asulam did little harm to young trees and other plant species, however its use is no longer approved of.  The use of glyphosate is also problematic. It has been suggested that it may be geotoxic & carcinogenic [EFSA 2017 Risk Assessment: Glyphosate]. The UK considered a ban, but as of last year its use was still allowed. Recent work [by Forestry England et al] has revealed an alternative herbicide that may be useful in controlling bracken - namely amidosulfuron. It works by inhibiting enzymes which control amino acid and protein metabolism.  It is thought to have low toxicity to mammals, and is stabile in light. Early trials indicate that it might be suitable for the suppression of bracken in strands of norway spruce, oaks, scots pine, sitka spruce and silver birch. [caption id="attachment_42998" align="aligncenter" width="700"] During the Age of Dinosaurs) ferns were among the most abundant ground level vegetation and a significant food source for many herbivorous dinosaurs.[/caption]

The UK generally experiences a temperate oceanic climate, which is characterised by mild temperatures, moderate rainfall, and relatively small temperature changes between the seasons.  It is not surprising that there have been some 500 species successfully introduced to gardens and arboreta since 1500. This compares to the thirty something native tree species.  It is perhaps not surprising that introduced species of conifer are used to make up the bulk of plantations / forests for timber production.  Of these, Sitka Spruce is the most common; the others are Scots pine (a native species) Corsican pine,  Norway spruce European larch Hybrid larch Japanese larch Douglas fir and  Lodgepole pine With the exception of Scot’s pine, all are introduced species.  Sitka Spruce accounts for one fifth of forest cover in the UK and half of the timber produced.  The 'value' of Sitka is that it :- grows in a wide range of sites / soils tolerates wind exposure has a high initial growth rate is not a favourite of deer, especially if alternatives are available. gives high yields of timber However, there are problems with being over reliant on a limited number of species.  Three significant challenges could be   Climate change Extreme weather events Introduced pests and pathogens. Our climate is changing to hotter, drier summers coupled with milder, wetter winters.  Extreme weather events, like the storm of 1987 can reek devastation of large areas of forest.   Pests and diseases can rapidly spread through plantations / forests that are essentially monocultures.  The globalisation of world trade has made it 'easier' for pathogens and pests to move around.  Recent years has seen a significant increase in disease, for example, needle blight and phytophthora; also the pest - the appearance of the eight toothed spruce bark beetle.  There is a finite risk that something could arrive and devastate Sitka Spruce populations, and have dramatic effects on the timber industry.  Worse still would be the arrival of multiple pests or pathogens which could initiate a collapse of a forest ecosystem. If the range of tree species planted was increased then the impact of such introductions would hopefully be reduced.  There is also some evidence that a variety of species helps improve resistance to natural disturbances and offers a degree of resilience (though mixed species stands are not always more  resistant to drought).  Consequently, work is underway to determine which, if any, other conifer species might be planted to  Reduce the reliance on traditional timber-producing species Increase resilience and diversify commercial forests. Between 2015 & 2018, Forestry Research Et al. set up across the country a number of clear fell sites, these ranged from Breckland in the east to northern Scotland.  The sites offered a range of soil types and different weather conditions.  The experimental plots measured some 32 x 32 meters, and the trees were spaced 1.9m apart.  The 25 trees ar the centre of each plot were measured throughout the experiment.  Each site studied the establishment and growth of some 19 species.  Scots Pine was planted at each site as a 'control' as it was anticipated that it would establish and grow at all trial sites.  Douglas Fir was also included in these trials as it was thought to be 'under used' in national planting schemes [it only represents 4% of the UK total coniferous growing area], and might be used in a wider range of sites than at present.   The trees at each site had their height and root collar diameter measured, survival was also recorded. Trees included in these trials trials included  Norway spruce Noble fir Grand fir Pacific silver fir Maritime pine Western red cedar Leyland cypress, amongst others. The trials have yielded some interesting observations.  There were significant differences in the performance of the various species at the different locations.  For example, growth and establishment of most trees tested was poorest at Thetford on the Breckland. Interestingly, the inclusion of Douglas Fir proved worthwhile as it performed well, establishing and growing well even on poor / infertile soils, such as that at Thetford.  Data from Europe suggests that it can even maintain growth when experiencing draught, so it would appear to be more versatile than previously thought.  It could also prove to be a viable alternative to Sitka spruce, especially in the south or eastern parts of the UK where it may become hotter and drier in the future.   Another species that did quite well was Maritime Pine, which is thought to be relatively resistant to needle blight (as compared to Corsican pine) and it dealt well with the dryness at Thetford.  Unfortunately, it was not included in the trial Scottish sites.  It would seem to have potential as a fast growing and robust species on sheltered, free draining sites. Other species did not fare well, for example, Macedonian Pine did not establish well on any of the Scottish sites.  European silver fir performed poorly at all sites, and largely failed at Thetford.  It, together with pacific silver fir, grand fir, western red cedar, and coast redwood may not be suited for establishment on clear fell sites, though they might be ok in more shaded conditions beneath other trees.  The Oriental and Serbian Spruce did not establish on any of the sites. Further details of these trials can be found here: https://academic.oup.com/forestry/advance-article/doi/10.1093/forestry/cpaf048/8229725?login=false  or as a PDF here: https://academic.oup.com/forestry/advance-article/doi/10.1093/forestry/cpaf048/8229725 ,

Whilst it can be amusing to watch the antics of a grey squirrel hopping about in your garden, they are generally seen as a pest.  In your garden, you might find some of your bulbs have disappeared or in the fruit season, some of your soft fruits might be ‘missing’.  However, in woodland and forests they are adept at stripping bark from trees, which obviously wounds the trees, distorts growth and may allow for the entry of pathogens.  Grey squirrel damage to trees in England and Wales has been estimated to cost £37m a year in lost timber value and reduced carbon capture. The squirrels tend to select vigorous trees as they have a bark with a rich sap content, such as  sycamore, beech, birch and oak.  It has been suggested that they targeted such trees for their sugar content, as much bark stripping activity occurs in May to July, a period when the tree would be actively photosynthesising and transporting sugars around the tree in the phloem tissue (bast).  However, recent work suggests that they may be after micro-nutrients, such as calcium.   [caption id="attachment_41889" align="alignleft" width="300"] squirrel[/caption] Scientists from Bangor University have investigated and compared the microbiome of grey and red squirrels.  The microbiome refers to the make-up on the bacteria and other microbes present in the gut.  They help in the breaking down of food materials, and the production of vitamins.  They found the intestinal (caecum*) microbiome or microbiota of grey squirrels is more diverse than that of red squirrels, and where there were bacterial species in common then the amounts differed. These findings might help explain why grey squirrels can, for example,  digest acorns readily despite their tannin content, whereas red struggle to make full use of this plentiful food supply.   The grey squirrel gut also has a bacterium - Oxalobacter.  This bacterium can change the insoluble calcium from tree bark into a more digestible form.  Calcium levels in trees tend to rise in late spring / early summer when squirrels indulge in bark stripping.  Red squirrels strip bark less frequently than greys, this may be due to their somewhat more limited, less diverse microbiome.  The microbial diversity of grey squirrels may enable them to use a greater range of materials than the red squirrels, perhaps explaining in part their spread and the displacement of the red squirrel. Another factor leading to the displacement of the red squirrel has been the spread of the squirrel pox virus into the red squirrel population.  This virus has little effect on grey squirrels but leads to sickness and often death in red squirrels.  The grey squirrel also harbours another threat to red squirrels - the adenovirus.  Again grey squirrels seem unaffected by this, but red squirrels develop severe intestinal damage.  This difference may again be related to the difference in the microbiome of the two types of squirrel. Note : the caecum is a pouch within the gut, between the small and large intestine where the digestion of cellulose etc takes place, it is 'rich' in bacteria. More detail on grey squirrels in the links below :  https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001793 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38354038/ https://www.bangor.ac.uk/news/2024-02-21-gut-bacteria-may-explain-why-grey-squirrels-outcompete-reds-new-research and https://rfs.org.uk/insights-publications/rfs-reports/report-overview-the-cost-of-grey-squirrel-damage-to-woodland-in-england-and-wales/

Across Europe, red squirrels are found in coniferous forests and deciduous woodlands.  Populations are found in Spain and Italy, up in parts of Scandinavia, and into parts of Western Russia.  This distribution suggests that the red squirrel can cope with a variety of environmental / climatic conditions. An important haven for red squirrels in the UK is the Isle of Wight, whose ‘isolation’ keeps the population away from the introduced American grey squirrels. The island has enough trees and hedgerows for the estimated population of some 3000+  red squirrels and for the population to grow. Their diet consists mainly of tree seeds, complemented with insects, birds’ eggs and some fungi. Grey squirrels have replaced red squirrels in many parts of the UK. To investigate if red squirrels might be able to cope with a changing climate (such as warmer and drier summers, reduced rainfall etc), Alyson Buchanan of Bournemouth University has used computer climate models to assess whether the squirrels could survive in changed conditions (such as might occur with climate change).  The computer simulations revealed that it is likely that red squirrels can indeed cope with Temperature changes and Reduced rainfall  That is, the red squirrel has a natural ability cope with, or has a resilience to different climatic conditions.  Other factors are, of course,  important in determining the survival of populations, notably Habitat availability Disease e.g squirrel pox Competing species Positive conservation measures to help the red squirrel.