The tallest tree in England, a Douglas fir, is found on Exmoor.  The Douglas Fir was introduced into cultivation in 1827 by David Douglas.  Douglas was a gardener and botanist, who spent his early career in Scotland including time at the Botanical Gardens of Glasgow University.  He was recommended to the Royal Horticultural Society by William J Hooker, the first director of Kew Gardens.  Douglas made three trips to North America and was ultimately responsible for the introduction of many different species.  Some of the plants introduced during Victorian times include Sitka Spruce, Sugar Pine, Western White Pine, Ponderosa Pine, Lodgepole Pine, and Monterey Pine. These have transformed our landscape and the timber industry. Sadly, David Douglas died at an early age on an expedition to Hawaii, in suspicious circumstances. The Douglas Fir, despite its other common names, Douglas Spruce, Oregon Pine - is not a true fir , spruce, or pine. It is also not a hemlock. Its genus name is Pseudotsuga, means false hemlock.  The trees can grow to heights of nearly 100 metres, especially in their native coastal regions and may have a life span of 500 years. The Exmoor tree, planted 150 years ago, has reached a height of 63 metres (over 200 feet). However, as a relative youngster it still has some way to go — and it has competition. A recent survey* revealed there are a half million redwood trees in the UK.  Three species exist: the coastal redwood (Sequoia sempervirens ), the giant sequoia / redwood (Sequoiadendron giganteum), and the dawn redwood (Metasequoia glyptostroboides) They are among the largest trees on earth.  The coastal redwoods are the tallest of the three species.  The largest was measured to have a height of some 379 feet (115.5M).   Not only are these trees large but they are also impressive because of their longevity, living for a thousand years is not unusual.  Dendrochronology has aged one specimen at over 2500 years.   The coastal and the giant redwoods are found naturally on the pacific coast of California and Oregon.  Many of the UK redwoods, like the Douglas Fir, were introduced in Victorian times.  They were often planted on the estates of the wealthy and landed gentry. There are now probably more redwoods in the UK than in their native Pacific Coast range. Recent hot and dry weather has stressed the American trees, exposing them to intense wildfires. A recent study of some 5000 redwoods investigated how well the trees were ‘performing’ when compared to their American counterparts.  The tree were scanned with lasers  [a non invasive technique] to determine their height and volume (= biomass),  They were found to be growing just as well as those in the Sierra Nevada, this is probably due to our relatively mild but wet climate. The tallest redwood tree in the UK stands at 58 metres at Longleat, so somewhat behind the Douglas fir. However, whilst the Douglas Fir may have a life span of 500 years, a redwood can survive for 2000+ years, giving it time to catch up and overtake. * see  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68518623 and https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.230603

The colours found in the flowers and leaves of flowering plants [Angiosperms] can be ascribed to four major 'families' of pigments; the chlorophylls, carotenoids, flavonoids and betalains.  The chlorophylls are perhaps the most familiar as they are the main photosynthetic pigments, absorbing blue and red wavelengths of light. Chlorophyll in flowers is relatively unusual.  Indeed, green flowers are quite rare and often associated with wind pollination. Examples of green flowers include some species of Euphorbia, Hedera and Fritillaria. Green flowers, despite their less conspicuous nature, can still attract insect pollinators.  This is due partly to differences in light scattering and brightness (achromatic contrast) as revealed recently by researchers at the Univeristy of Seville. The carotenoids are pigments belonging to the isoprenoid group of chemicals.  They are commonly present in flowers, absorbing mainly blue wavelengths of light. They lend yellow, orange and very occasionally red colour to flowers.  Carotenoids are the petal pigments of many yellow-flowered plants of the Daisy (Asteraceae) and Bean (Fabaceae) families.  The flavonoids offer the most diverse range of pigments.  They are water-soluble polyphenols found in nearly all vascular plants. They are located in the vacuoles of cells.  Certain flavonoid groups, such as, the catechins, flavonols, flavones, isoflavones absorb in the ultraviolet region of the spectrum.  They are invisible to humans but can be recognised by many bees, flies, butterflies and most birds.  The anthocyanins, also part of the flavonoid group, absorb green light and reflect shades of purple, blue, and red. They occur in many tissues of flowering plants, including leaves, roots, and fruits (think blueberries and raspberries). The last group are the betalains. The name derives from the beetroot (Beta vulgaris).  They are nitrogen containing compounds, derived from the amino acid tyrosine. Betalains give rise to yellow to pink and red colours. The deep red-purple colour of beets, bougainvillea, amaranth, and many cacti comes from certain betalain pigments. Interestingly, plants that produce betalain pigments do not form anthocyanins.   Apart from these four major pigment types, other rarer pigments do exist. For example, the xanthones found in some species of irises.  Flower colours may be generated from one specific pigment or through the combination of different pigments. Thus, red petals may be result of red anthocyanins, or red betalains, red carotenoids, or even by the combination of orange carotenoids with purple anthocyanins.  The carotenoids and chlorophylls are stored in chromoplasts and chloroplasts of the petals respectively. Chromoplasts are membrane-bound, fluid filled  vesicles in which pigments may be stored.  Flavonoids and betalains, which are water-soluble compounds, are found in the vacuoles of cells. White petals result from the absence of coloured pigments and thus reflect all wavelengths of visible light, though UV light may be absorbed.  Most plants have a distinctive flower colour that is stable, despite the vagaries of climate.  Sometimes the flower colour can darken or even change.  For example, the colour may deepen over time or even alter.  The Purple Mistress [Moricandia arvensis, found in the mediterranean region] has lilac coloured flowers in spring, but these change to white flowers in the summer. [caption id="attachment_42267" align="aligncenter" width="675"] Iris[/caption]  

The grey—brown skeletal branches of trees are being cloaked in fresh green leaves as they unfurl from the buds that protected them through the winter months.  Their bright green colour is due to large amounts of chlorophyll.  The chlorophylls are pigments that can absorb many of the wavelengths of visible light, but not green.  Green wavelengths are reflected back into the environment, which is why our eyes perceive both young and mature leaves as green. Each leaf is made up of a variety of cells and tissues.  The top and bottom of the leaf are covered with a layer of cells  termed the epidermis.  It consists of many interlocking cells (rather like jigsaw pieces), sometimes called pavement cells.  Their function is to protect the underlying cells and also produce the waxy, waterproofing layer — the cuticle.   The lower epidermis is ‘pierced’ by the stomates.  These are the ‘breathing pores’ of the leaf, allowing the exchange of gases and water vapour.   The epidermis may also bear trichomes.  These are small ‘hair—like’ projections.  If there are many of them they can give the leaf a white or silvery appearance, helping to trap moist air near to the leaf surface to reduce water loss.  They  may also help to reflect sunlight, so that the leaf does not get too hot and on cold days can serve to protect the leaf from frost damage. Some trichomes have a protective function in that they may physically restrict the feeding of insects and other herbivores, and some contain a cocktail of toxic chemicals [e.g. nettles]. Under the upper epidermis and within the leaf, there is one or more layers of cells packed with chloroplasts - the palisade layer.  This is the principal site of photosynthesis within the leaf, where carbon dioxide is fixed into sugars and other vital nutrients.  The ‘by-product’ of photosynthesis is oxygen, which is not only essential for plant respiration but needed by the vast majority of animals on this planet.  It diffuses out of the leaf through the intercellular spaces of the next layer of the leaf - the mesophyll layer. The stomates allow gases in and out, but can close through the movement of their guard cells.  Stomates tend to close up at night or when the leaf experiences water stress.  Running throughout the body of the leaf is the xylem and phloem tissues, which conduct water, minerals and sugars etc around the plant. The sheer abundance of chlorophyll in many leaves masks the presence of other pigments, which only become visible when the leaf begins to senesce and the chlorophylls break down.  The leaf turns a yellow / orange colour due to the presence of carotenoid pigments.  Autumnal leaves can display a variety of colours due to other pigments such as the anthocyanins and xanthophylls.  Some leaves take protection very seriously   Curious fact : the leaf with the largest surface area is that of the Amazonian water lily, which can be 10 feet in diameter.

Leaves have three main parts:  The petiole, a stalk-like structure that connects the blade of the leaf to the stem of the plant. Some leaves don’t have petioles,  and are known as sessile leaves. The blade or lamina, usually the largest part of the leaf.  The edge of the leaf or the leaf margin may be described as entire, toothed, or lobed. The oak leaf, for example, is clearly lobed. The blade has many veins, forming a network, carrying water and nutrients, The base, the base is the region of the blade that attaches to the petiole. A leaf is said to be simple if its blade / lamina is undivided, if the ‘teeth’ or lobes do not reach down to the main vein of the leaf.  A compound leaf has several leaflets, which join up with a single leaf stalk or petiole. When identifying tree leaves, it is always important to look for the petiole,   as a single leaflet of a compound leaf can look like a simple leaf.  More details of leaf and tree structure can be found on this link on our website. Now for a challenge.  Can you or your children find a leaf (and name the tree it came from), that Has a serrated / toothed edge Has a lobed margin Has a smooth edge / margin Is a compound, palmate leaf Is a compound, pinnate leaf Is hairy Is not green, but red or a mixture of colours Is more or less circular Is fleshy / succulent Has spines on its edges Is needle shaped Has a thick (waxy?) cuticle or is very shiny Has net venation  is marcescent (might keep you hanging around) Go forage!

The terms ghosts and zombies often feature in films or TV programmes, but across the country the terms can also be applied to many hundreds, possibly thousands of lost and abandoned ponds.  Ponds have featured in the landscape for centuries or millennia.  Pingos -  formed in the depressions left after the last ice age. The middle of the C20th saw not only the destruction of many hedgerows, but the removal of many ponds.  This was particularly true in farming areas like East Anglia.  The strategy was to increase field size and allow access of complex machinery that was becoming available at that time; for example large combine harvesters.  Whilst the loss of the hedgerows and associated wildlife is well documented, the loss of ponds has not attracted so much attention.  Many hundred of ponds were filled in (often using the debris and material from the destruction of the hedgerows), to give a few more metres of arable land, and with machinery replacing horses the need for ‘watering holes’ diminished.  The infilled ponds are sometimes referred to as ghost ponds.  The location of these 'ponds' can sometimes be found  By studying old ordnance survey (or tithe) maps or  They may be visible using aerial photography / drones and picking up a different colour or shade of the crop growing in a field Noticing the accumulation of water after heavy rain in a slight depression, or a mist hovering over a particular part of a field A zombie pond is somewhat different.  It is a pond or very wet, marsh area which is shadowed by a tree canopy.  The pond has filled over many, many years with dead leaves, so that it has a deep layer of decomposing organic material.  The pond margins is generally overgrown, with willow and other vegetation where have begun to ‘invade’.  The pond is half dead / half alive, hence the term 'zombie'.  The area / water becomes anaerobic / anoxic, as the dead leaves rot and use up oxygen. Few life forms call it home - perhaps midge larvae or the occasional beetle. Indeed, such ponds may release not only carbon dioxide but also methane; the latter is a particularly potent greenhouse gas.  Zombie ponds may be found in woodlands, particularly where active management has fallen by the wayside. However, not all is lost, both ghost and zombie ponds can be resurrected.  In the case of ghost ponds, the infilling material / soil is dug out until the original base layer is reached.   This may be recognised by the dark, fine silt layer / sediment, which may contain the remnants of water snail shells.  Ideally, the excavation should mirror the original outline of the pond.  This may be determined in part by digging two trenches at right angles to each other. Details of the restoration procedure may be found here.   Freshly excavated ghost ponds should be left to fill with rainwater through the winter months, and left for plants and animal to colonise naturally.  Amazingly, several pond restoration projects have demonstrated that the original silt layer of the pond is a valuable seedbed of many aquatic and emergent plant species, even though the seeds may have lain there dormant for decades , possibly centuries.  The refreshed pond should also have a surrounding margin of land to separate it from any adjacent farmland activities - to prevent nutrient run off / pesticide application etc.  Further details of the restoration of lost ponds can be found at:- https://norfolkponds.org/ https://www.ucl.ac.uk/geography/news/2023/nov/bringing-ghost-ponds-back-life https://www.essexwt.org.uk/recovering-lost-ponds In the case of zombie ponds, there is a similar approach to restoration but it begins with the cutting back and / or removal of trees from around the pond to let light in.  Then the layers of rotting leaves / organic materials are scooped out, so that the original sediments of the pond are exposed.  The depth of the decomposing material may be quite significant.  However, with light pouring in and the rotting material removing the pond can soon develop a diverse community of plants (from the seedbed and pond 'visitors' e.g water-crowfoot, stoneworts, and animals).  The restoration / renewal of ponds in fields, meadows or woodlands makes a significant contribution to the biodiversity of an area. There is an excellent video about the restoration of ghost and zombie ponds on YouTube, featuring Professor Carl Sayer (UCL). Professor Sayer grew up in Norfolk, where many of these ‘hidden’ / lost ponds are to be found.  Visit the Razor Science Show “Bringing 'ghost' and 'zombie' ponds back from the dead”. [https://youtu.be/SYkbDdaUMBY?si=gd2jbfxk4iXLSFL5]  

While protecting dormouse habitats has become one of the big themes of British woodland conservation, it’s remarkable how little is actually known about these elusive creatures. At a recent dormouse education day led by Tom Fairfield, thirty enthusiastic conservationists fired off a barrage of questions—some of which even he struggled to answer. Why do we care about them? How many are there? Is their population stable or declining? However, “Dormouse Tom” was able to answer many other important questions about the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius). For instance, they are widespread across southern and south-western England and in Wales (distribution map). He showed us dozens of photos of dormouse nests and demonstrated that hazel dormice aren’t restricted to hazel woodlands—they’ve been found in conifer plantations, and occasionally even on stony beaches. Tom believes the habitat protections put in place for the HS2 high-speed rail line don’t go far enough. The ecologists at Balfour Beatty only surveyed hazel woodlands along the planned route, ignoring other potential dormouse habitats. He’s learned a great deal about dormouse habits through two key methods: installing nest boxes and examining teeth marks left on discarded hazelnuts. If our roles were reversed, perhaps dormice would measure the human population by building us cosy hotels and searching for discarded apple cores. In late March and early April, dormice begin to emerge from hibernation, but they are nocturnal and difficult to spot—one of the ways they avoid predation. Tom acknowledges that some dormice are likely to be harmed during forestry operations, but there are steps foresters and builders can take to minimise the impact. His approach starts with surveys—though thorough ones can be costly. These, however, make it easier to implement core elements of a dormouse mitigation plan: avoiding key habitats, establishing buffer zones to protect woodland edges, and creating no-go areas during the breeding season (April to October). A forester from Natural Resources Wales attending the course pointed out a serious tension: if summer months are off-limits for forestry, operations must be pushed into winter, when wetter conditions and heavy machinery risk causing ruts and soil compaction. In parts of south-east England, the tiny hazel dormice are facing competition from the much larger edible dormouse (Glis glis), also known as the European fat dormouse. Introduced by the Romans and raised for food, these creatures were fattened in ceramic pots called gliraria and are still eaten today in countries like Slovenia and Croatia. Dormouse habitat protection seems set to remain a key part of British woodland conservation—partly because dormice are considered a “flagship species”: a charismatic and recognisable animal that represents deciduous woodland and helps rally public support for wider conservation efforts. Note there is a woodlands TV film about the hazel dormouse: [embed]https://youtu.be/COUh5ZluEew?si=1upUveV1FLoQRXV6[/embed]

The last century saw the destruction of many hedgerows, particularly in farming areas like East Anglia.  The logic behind this was : to increase field size and  allow ease of access of machinery, like combine harvesters that were coming available at that time.   Whilst the loss of the hedgerows and the associated wildlife is well documented, the loss of ponds during this time has not attracted the same level of attention.  Many hundreds of ponds were filled in, to give a few more metres of arable land.  The whereabouts of some of these ponds can sometimes be found on old ordnance survey maps.  Many were located on farmland and their origins may extend back centuries to when they were created as marl or clay pits, sometimes for the watering of livestock.  Some were formed in depressions (pingos) left after the last ice age. There are still  thousands of ponds across the UK but many are polluted to a greater or lesser extent, or drained.  The pollution may be associated with the the surrounding land use or agricultural runoff. Runoff may take the form of nitrates / phosphates from the use of fertilisers.  In freshwater systems, these nutrients can cause eutrophication. Other agricultural chemicals may enter ponds and water courses - insecticides, fungicides, herbicides etc. Consequently, out of the thousands of ponds, only a very small number provide a suitable habitat for pond organisms such as the medicinal leech.  Leeches are rarely found for the reasons cited above but also because, as agriculture became more mechanised and less reliant on ‘animal power’ [horses, oxen], the ponds  (or wetlands) are no longer visited by these animals, which leeches would have fed on.  Leeches used to be abundant, but their number declined when their use in blood letting was largely abandoned, and their natural habitats were drained or damaged.  The medicinal leech is one of the largest leeches found in the UK, it can grow to a length of ten centimetres, and may have stripes / patterns on its body.  Some of the ponds that are home to medicinal leeches have been designated  Sites of Special Scientific Interest.  Since historic times, the extraction of blood by leeches was deemed to be a ‘healing process’ for patients. This practice of hirundotherapy / bloodletting spread widely and the collection of leeches resulted in the over-exploitation of many populations.  The leeches were used widely in the treatment of many conditions and  diseases such as cholera, regardless of whether or not they were effective.  At one stage, leeches were in such demand that there were ‘leech farms’, and  people could earn a living as leech collectors.  Indeed, so commonplace was leech collection that Wordsworth wrote about it in his poem Resolution and Independence : “He told, that to these waters he had come To gather leeches, being old and poor: Employment hazardous and wearisome! And he had many hardships to endure: From pond to pond he roamed, from moor to moor; Housing, with God’s good help, by choice or chance; And in this way he gained an honest maintenance.” Although the use of medicinal leeches was discredited and virtually abandoned for many decades, they are medically effective in certain circumstances.  The leeches produce a saliva which  contains a number of different proteins. These help the leech to feed by keeping the blood from clotting, and actually increasing blood flow to the leech at the point of attachment.  Some of these proteins act as anticoagulants (notably hirudin),   It is also possible that the saliva contains an 'anaesthetic / antiseptic' as leech bites are generally not painful. These leeches have now found a use in microsurgery.  They are used to stimulate the circulation in tissues which experience post-operative congestion.  They are helpful in finger reattachment and reconstructive surgery of the ear, nose, lip, and eyelid. The creation of a network of new or restored freshwater ponds across the landscape will be needed if natural populations of the leech are to expand. 

Back in the Nineteenth Century, John Bennet Lawes, a Victorian entrepreneur founded a research station at Rothamsted Manor.  It was to investigate the impact of organic and inorganic fertilisers on crop yield.  Lawes had a factory making some of the first artificial fertilisers.  The manor was to become the Rothamsted Experimental Station, now known as Rothamsted Research.  It has two of the longest running experiments - the Broad balk experiment and the Park Grass experiment - started in 1856. The Park Grass area was started by Lawes and Gilbert.  Its original purpose was to investigate ways of improving the yield of hay through the use of inorganic fertilisers or organic manures. Different strips of land received varying amounts of fertiliser to none.  It soon became clear that the different treatments had a dramatic effect on the species composition of what had been a uniform sward.  There are 35-45 plant species on the unfertilised plots but only 2 or 3 species on some of the fertilised plots. Fertilisers create conditions that allow fast growing grasses to dominate the vegetation.  More recently the plots have received attention (by Dr Balfour et al, Sussex University) for the number of pollinators that they support.  It was found that High levels of common fertilisers on grassland halves the pollinator numbers. Increasing the amount / availability of NPK (nitrogen phosphorus and potassium) on grassland reduces flower numbers five fold. Bee number were most affected.  There were 9 times more bees in untreated plants compared to plots with the most fertiliser input.   The number of bees, hoverflies, butterflies, wasps and flies on each experiment strip was counted. Whilst all pollinator types were present on untreated plots or with low fertiliser levels, only flies and beetles were present on high fertiliser plots. Interestingly, plots with lime added which changed the soil pH had more pollinators (50%) and flower species than those not treated with lime. as fertiliser use increases so there is a decrease in pollinator numbers.   Though these observations are for a specific area of managed grassland, they can be considered in a broader context.  Many grasslands and meadows, which offered homes to pollinators, have been lost in recent times,.  Over a similar period of time, farmlands across the country have extended (eg. hedgerow removal, ploughing meadows) and have been making significant use of fertiliser to improve crop yield, but the wider effects of these changes on insect populations and biodiversity in general has not received enough attention. The ‘excessive’ use of fertilisers can lead to soil eutrophication, air pollution, freshwater eutrophication and a loss of biodiversity.  It can favour botanical thugs )like nettles and invasive species.  We do know that there have been dramatic falls in insect numbers in recent years in what has been termed the ‘insect armageddon or the ‘insect apocalypse’.  Whilst there are many factors at play affecting insect numbers (such as the intensive use of pesticides), the maintenance or the reintroduction of natural areas [with low nutrient soil and native wild flowers] within farmland would at least offer sanctuary to many insects / pollinators that are vital for our crops.  Any reduction in the use of fertilisers would help reduce the CO2 emissions resulting from the Haber–Bosch process, used to produce ammonia and ammonium nitrate. Interesting fact : the institute employed Ronald Fisher in the 1920s to analyse data collected from many experiments.  His work and that of other statisticians means that many consider Rothamsted the birthplace of modern statistical theory (e.g. analysis of variance) and practice.